Facility Optimization

Improve performance inside the footprint—before adding more space.

KAG validates how the operation and existing footprint perform, then develops future-state scenarios involving process, labor, layout, storage, equipment, infrastructure, and physical change.

HOW THIS CAPABILITY CONTRIBUTES

STARTING QUESTION

What could the current operation and facility become through changes to process, labor, flow, storage, equipment, infrastructure, and physical design?

DEPTH OF WORK

Validates and quantifies the current state, develops future-state operating scenarios, and defines the labor, equipment, facility, and capital requirements of the current-site alternative.

ROLE IN THE CONNECTED DECISION

Develops the optimize-or-repurpose alternative so it can be evaluated with real-estate, capital, portfolio, and execution realities against the operating requirement.

Engagement option 1

Focused engagement

Develop the current-site operating solution.

  • Validate current-state flow, throughput, usable capacity, storage, and labor requirements
  • Develop future-state process, labor, layout, storage, and equipment scenarios
  • Define racking, forklift, concrete, utility, infrastructure, and facility requirements
  • Quantify operating effects, investment ranges, tradeoffs, and implementation requirements.

Best when the current site must be fully developed as a viable alternative before the business commits to improving, expanding, relocating, or repurposing.

CURRENT STATEExcess travel • crossing paths • fragmented spaceOPTIMIZED STATEClear flow • purposeful zones • usable capacity
CURRENT-SITE OPERATING ALTERNATIVE
FACILITY RESPONSE
PROPERTY ALTERNATIVES
CAPITAL IMPLICATIONS
PORTFOLIO ROLE
DELIVERY REALITIES
THE CURRENT-SITE OPTION IS TESTED WITH CONNECTED ALTERNATIVES.
Engagement option 2

Connected engagement

Develop the current-site option without losing sight of the other paths.

  • Create a quantified current-site operating alternative
  • Compare labor, process, physical, equipment, and capital levers
  • Define inputs required for property and portfolio alternatives
  • Provide a developed option for the connected business decision.

Best when facility performance is tied to a larger capital, growth, real estate, or network decision.

Process and material flow

How people, product, information, equipment, and vehicles move through the operation.

Space utilization

Where the footprint is overburdened, underused, fragmented, or poorly matched to the work.

Usable capacity

What the site can support today and where practical additional capacity may exist.

Storage and staging

How inventory, materials, work-in-process, and staging areas support or constrain performance.

Facility and infrastructure fit

Whether building systems, access, equipment, utilities, and support areas match operational needs.

Operating environment

How layout and site conditions affect safety, service, visibility, and day-to-day execution.

VALIDATED CURRENT STATE

Quantify flow, throughput, usable capacity, storage, labor, and facility performance.

FUTURE-STATE OPERATING MODEL

Design how work, labor, inventory, equipment, and information should move.

LAYOUT + STORAGE DESIGN

Define zones, staging, racking, circulation, and space-use requirements.

EQUIPMENT + INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS

Establish forklift, racking, concrete, utility, equipment, and facility changes.

OPERATING + CAPITAL IMPLICATIONS

Quantify benefits, costs, tradeoffs, and practical implementation constraints.

DEVELOPED CURRENT-SITE ALTERNATIVE

Create an optimize-or-repurpose scenario ready to compare with real-estate, capital, portfolio, and execution alternatives.

Ideal situations

Evidence indicates the current site can support the business with targeted changes
Flow, handling, congestion, labor design, or excessive movement is limiting performance.
Usable capacity must be quantified before adding space
Storage, staging, layout, or infrastructure must be redesigned
New equipment, systems, or automation require operating analysis
Leadership needs an optimized-site plan before capital approval or delivery

WHAT THIS WORK CHANGES.

TEST CURRENT-SITE POTENTIAL

Quantify what the existing footprint can realistically support before defaulting to expansion.

IMPROVE THE OPERATING MODEL

Rework flow, labor, storage, and support infrastructure into a coordinated operating state.

DEFINE THE INVESTMENT PATH

Translate the optimized scenario into sequenced requirements, cost implications, and execution priorities.

PUT THE CURRENT SITE ON EQUAL FOOTING WITH THE OTHER OPTIONS.

Develop the evidence, scope, and investment case required for a real comparison.

Start the conversation